Prof Ramlah Adam from UiTM asked “Why challenge the NEP which was working so well?” You can read about it here.
Well, why not, i ask? After all, isn't the NEP unfair? Isn't it based on principles of discrimination? Doesn't it offend basic human rights principles? I would answer all these in the affirmative - and think that that itself is good enough reason to challenge it.
Furthermore and/or in the alternative, i would like to ask the learned prof what makes her think it is 'working so well'? Is it because it benefits the people of the Malay race and she is from that race? Perhaps she is not in a position to make such a decision then. (Altho some think that altho it attempts to help the Malays, it doesn't in reality. Not for all of them).
Anyways, if it really has been working so well, why do we need to keep it anymore? If it worked so well, it should have achieved its goals long ago.
Malaysia boleh!
No comments:
Post a Comment